Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
KWEB vs PPA
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF, side by side on the themes desk.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ| KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | KraneShares | Invesco |
| Theme | Internet and e-commerce | Defense |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 71.1% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 96.4% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 7.9% | 7.3% |
| Holdings | 33 | 60 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 60.2% | 55.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.58% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.69% | 0.60% |
| Total return, 1 year | −27.2% | +12.6% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −47.2 pts | −7.3 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −52.8 pts | −13.0 pts |
| Below its high | −69.8% | −10.9% |
KWEB in plain words
By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 33 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −27.2% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 47.2 pts. It sits 69.8% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.
PPA in plain words
By weight, 71% of PPA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 60 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +12.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 7.3 pts. It sits 10.9% below its all-time high of Mar 2, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do KWEB and PPA hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, KWEB or PPA?
- KWEB has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and PPA has 71%, so KWEB differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, KWEB or PPA?
- KWEB charges 0.69% a year and PPA charges 0.58%, so PPA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this page. ETFIQ, KWEB against PPA, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/KWEB-PPA.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; every figure here is stated arithmetic on published data. Standards and sources