Do KWEB and NLR hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, KWEB or NLR?

KWEB has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and NLR has 15%, so KWEB differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, KWEB or NLR?

KWEB charges 0.69% a year and NLR charges 0.52%, so NLR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.

KWEB vs NLR

Name: ETFIQ comparison of KWEB and NLR
Creator: ETFIQ

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF, side by side on the themes desk.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Open the live comparison on ETFIQ

KWEB and NLR on the themes desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
Issuer	KraneShares	VanEck
Theme	Internet and e-commerce	Nuclear and uranium
In the S&P 500	0.0%	15.1%
Active share vs the S&P 500	100.0%	99.8%
In the Nasdaq-100	7.9%	8.0%
Holdings	33	25
Top ten, share of the fund	60.2%	61.0%
Expense ratio	0.69%	0.52%
Fee for the differing part	0.69%	0.52%
Total return, 1 year	−27.2%	+4.0%
vs the S&P 500	−47.2 pts	−16.0 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100	−52.8 pts	−21.6 pts
Below its high	−69.8%	−27.0%

KWEB in plain words

By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 33 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −27.2% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 47.2 pts. It sits 69.8% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.

NLR in plain words

By weight, 15% of NLR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 25 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 16.0 pts. It sits 27.0% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do KWEB and NLR hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, KWEB or NLR?: KWEB has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and NLR has 15%, so KWEB differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, KWEB or NLR?: KWEB charges 0.69% a year and NLR charges 0.52%, so NLR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Cite this page. ETFIQ, KWEB against NLR, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/KWEB-NLR.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; every figure here is stated arithmetic on published data. Standards and sources