Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
COPX vs PPA
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, COPX and PPA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in COPX | Only in PPA |
|---|---|
| Lundin Mining Corporation 6.07% | Boeing Co. (The) 9.11% |
| GLENCORE PLC 6.00% | General Electric Co. 7.85% |
| Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. 5.98% | RTX Corp. 7.13% |
| KGHM POLSKA MIEDZ SPOLKA AKCYJNA 5.82% | Lockheed Martin Corp. 6.39% |
| FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC. 5.06% | General Dynamics Corp. 4.52% |
| Hudbay Minerals Inc. 4.95% | Northrop Grumman Corp. 4.46% |
| BHP GROUP LIMITED 4.92% | Honeywell International Inc. 4.39% |
| ANTOFAGASTA PLC 4.87% | Howmet Aerospace Inc. 4.18% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COPX | PPA | COPX | PPA | COPX | PPA | |
| 3 months | +12.8% | −3.0% | +8.1 pts | −7.7 pts | +10.7 pts | −5.1 pts |
| 6 months | +13.8% | −8.5% | −1.4 pts | −23.7 pts | −6.4 pts | −28.7 pts |
| 1 year | +85.6% | +12.6% | +65.7 pts | −7.3 pts | +60.0 pts | −13.0 pts |
| 3 years | +153.8% | +100.0% | +75.8 pts | +22.1 pts | +60.3 pts | +6.5 pts |
| Since launch | +191.0% | +1021.7% | −559.9 pts | +210.4 pts | −1371.8 pts | −662.3 pts |
| COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | Invesco |
| Theme | Electrification and the grid | Defense |
| In the S&P 500 | 5.1% | 71.1% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99.9% | 96.4% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 7.3% |
| Holdings | 39 | 60 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 53.4% | 55.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.58% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.65% | 0.60% |
| Total return, 1 year | +85.6% | +12.6% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +65.7 pts | −7.3 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +60.0 pts | −13.0 pts |
| Below its high | −6.0% | −10.9% |
COPX in plain words
By weight, 5% of COPX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 39 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +85.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 65.7 pts. It sits 6.0% below its all-time high of Aug 27, 2026.
PPA in plain words
By weight, 71% of PPA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 60 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +12.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 7.3 pts. It sits 10.9% below its all-time high of Mar 2, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do COPX and PPA hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, COPX or PPA?
- COPX has 5% of its weight in S&P 500 names and PPA has 71%, so COPX differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, COPX or PPA?
- COPX charges 0.65% a year and PPA charges 0.58%, so PPA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, COPX against PPA, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/COPX-PPA.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.