ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.

CIBR vs SKYY

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF and First Trust Cloud Computing ETF, side by side on the themes desk.

22% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CIBR and SKYY hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions CIBR and SKYY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCIBRSKYY
Cloudflare, Inc. (Class A)4.35%2.51%
Arista Networks, Inc.2.29%3.97%
Microsoft Corporation2.09%3.62%
Cisco Systems, Inc.6.84%1.97%
Rubrik, Inc. (Class A)2.95%1.94%
NetApp, Inc.2.01%1.74%
Alphabet Inc. (Class A)1.68%2.91%
Akamai Technologies, Inc.2.40%1.53%
International Business Machines Corporat1.49%2.58%
Qualys, Inc.0.96%0.85%
Elastic N.V.1.49%0.77%
Zscaler, Inc.3.47%0.66%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CIBROnly in SKYY
Fortinet, Inc. 8.54%Nutanix, Inc. (Class A) 4.27%
Broadcom Inc. 6.04%Everpure, Inc. (Class A) 4.09%
Okta, Inc. 4.17%Amazon.com, Inc. 3.12%
F5, Inc. 3.04%MongoDB, Inc. 2.99%
Gen Digital Inc. 2.50%Atlassian Corporation (Class A) 2.88%
Dynatrace, Inc. 2.30%GitLab Inc. (Class A) 2.62%
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 2.12%DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc. 2.35%
JFrog Ltd. 2.00%Oracle Corporation 2.30%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Sep 4, 2026.

Performance, window by window

CIBR and SKYY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
CIBRSKYYCIBRSKYYCIBRSKYY
3 months+9.2%+14.8%+4.5 pts+10.1 pts+7.1 pts+12.7 pts
6 months+43.7%+42.8%+28.5 pts+27.6 pts+23.5 pts+22.6 pts
1 year+31.4%+26.4%+11.5 pts+6.5 pts+5.9 pts+0.9 pts
3 years+102.4%+98.2%+24.5 pts+20.2 pts+8.9 pts+4.7 pts
Since launch+402.1%+723.9%+57.6 pts+74.8 pts−220.6 pts−579.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CIBR and SKYY on the themes desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
SKYY
First Trust Cloud Computing ETF
IssuerFirst TrustFirst Trust
ThemeCybersecurityCloud and software
In the S&P 50061.9%38.4%
Active share vs the S&P 50090.7%86.5%
In the Nasdaq-10047.9%19.9%
Holdings4364
Top ten, share of the fund56.9%32.7%
Expense ratio0.58%0.60%
Fee for the differing part0.64%0.69%
Total return, 1 year+31.4%+26.4%
vs the S&P 500+11.5 pts+6.5 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100+5.9 pts+0.9 pts
Below its high−7.5%−4.3%

CIBR in plain words

By weight, 62% of CIBR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 91%. The top ten holdings are 57% of the fund across 43 positions, as filed for Sep 3, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +31.4% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 11.5 pts. It sits 7.5% below its all-time high of Aug 13, 2026.

SKYY in plain words

By weight, 38% of SKYY's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 33% of the fund across 64 positions, as filed for Sep 3, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +26.4% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 6.5 pts.

Questions people ask

Do CIBR and SKYY hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 22% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, CIBR or SKYY?
CIBR has 62% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SKYY has 38%, so CIBR differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CIBR or SKYY?
CIBR charges 0.58% a year and SKYY charges 0.60%, so CIBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CIBR against SKYY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CIBR against SKYY, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/CIBR-SKYY.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources