Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
BOTZ vs PAVE
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BOTZ and PAVE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BOTZ | Only in PAVE |
|---|---|
| KEYENCE CORPORATION 9.34% | QUANTA SERVICES, INC. 4.18% |
| ABB Ltd 9.07% | CSX Corporation 3.48% |
| FANUC CORPORATION 9.02% | EATON CORPORATION PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 3.30% |
| NVIDIA CORPORATION 8.31% | HOWMET AEROSPACE INC. 3.27% |
| INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. 6.17% | TRANE TECHNOLOGIES PLC 3.19% |
| Shenzhen Inovance Technology Co., Ltd 4.34% | UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION 3.12% |
| SMC CORPORATION 4.03% | NUCOR CORPORATION 3.10% |
| DAIFUKU CO., LTD. 3.53% | ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC. 2.92% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOTZ | PAVE | BOTZ | PAVE | BOTZ | PAVE | |
| 3 months | −5.3% | −2.5% | −10.0 pts | −7.2 pts | −7.4 pts | −4.6 pts |
| 6 months | −0.3% | +7.1% | −15.5 pts | −8.0 pts | −20.5 pts | −13.0 pts |
| 1 year | +8.6% | +19.3% | −11.3 pts | −0.7 pts | −16.9 pts | −6.3 pts |
| 3 years | +36.4% | +77.6% | −41.5 pts | −0.4 pts | −57.0 pts | −15.9 pts |
| Since launch | +153.8% | +297.3% | −170.6 pts | +19.0 pts | −415.5 pts | −189.6 pts |
| BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF | PAVE Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | Global X |
| Theme | Robotics and automation | Infrastructure |
| In the S&P 500 | 18.7% | 62.1% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 88.1% | 97.2% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 18.7% | 6.2% |
| Holdings | 61 | 100 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 59.0% | 32.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.68% | 0.47% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.77% | 0.48% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.6% | +19.3% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −11.3 pts | −0.7 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −16.9 pts | −6.3 pts |
| Below its high | −13.6% | −7.9% |
BOTZ in plain words
By weight, 19% of BOTZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 88%. The top ten holdings are 59% of the fund across 61 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 11.3 pts. It sits 13.6% below its all-time high of May 13, 2026.
PAVE in plain words
By weight, 62% of PAVE's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 32% of the fund across 100 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +19.3% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. It sits 7.9% below its all-time high of Jun 25, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do BOTZ and PAVE hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, BOTZ or PAVE?
- BOTZ has 19% of its weight in S&P 500 names and PAVE has 62%, so PAVE differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, BOTZ or PAVE?
- BOTZ charges 0.68% a year and PAVE charges 0.47%, so PAVE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOTZ against PAVE, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/BOTZ-PAVE.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.