Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
SPYI vs XYLD
NEOS S&P 500(R) High Income ETF and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF, side by side on the income desk.
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ| SPYI NEOS S&P 500(R) High Income ETF | XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | NEOS | Global X |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | All-country world (ACWI) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 12.1% | 9.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.68% | 0.60% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 12.2% | 11.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | +4.2% | +6.5% |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.5% | +18.6% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +20.0% | +22.7% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.5 pts | −4.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 93% | 93% |
| Age | 1466 days | 4820 days |
SPYI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, SPYI paid 12.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +20.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.5 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 12.1%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
XYLD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, XYLD paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.6%. All-country world (ACWI) returned +22.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.1 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 9.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, SPYI or XYLD?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, SPYI paid 12.2% of its starting price in cash and XYLD paid 11.1%, so SPYI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, SPYI or XYLD?
- With every distribution reinvested, SPYI returned +17.5% and XYLD returned +18.6% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so XYLD returned more.
- Which is cheaper, SPYI or XYLD?
- SPYI charges 0.68% a year and XYLD charges 0.60%, so XYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPYI against XYLD, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/SPYI-XYLD.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; every figure here is stated arithmetic on published data. Standards and sources