Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
RYLD vs XYLD
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, RYLD and XYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in RYLD | Only in XYLD |
|---|---|
| Global X Russell 2000 ETF 100.00% | NVIDIA CORPORATION 7.85% |
| N/A 0.00% | APPLE INC. 6.45% |
| N/A 0.00% | MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.90% |
| N/A 0.00% | AMAZON.COM, INC. 4.19% |
| N/A 0.00% | ALPHABET INC. 3.63% |
| N/A 0.00% | BROADCOM INC. 3.20% |
| ALPHABET INC. 2.89% | |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. 2.17% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RYLD | XYLD | RYLD | XYLD | RYLD | XYLD | |
| 3 months | +7.0% | +5.7% | 3.1% | 2.6% | +1.7 pts | +0.2 pts |
| 6 months | +13.5% | +9.5% | 6.2% | 5.5% | −5.0 pts | −5.5 pts |
| 1 year | +21.0% | +18.6% | 12.4% | 11.1% | −5.4 pts | −4.1 pts |
| 3 years | +33.0% | +43.7% | 32.7% | 33.0% | −31.2 pts | −33.1 pts |
| Since launch | +54.7% | +191.1% | 67.2% | 112.9% | −54.1 pts | −137.7 pts |
| RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF | XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | Global X |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Russell 2000 (IWM) | All-country world (ACWI) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 12.2% | 9.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.60% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 12.4% | 11.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | +7.3% | +6.5% |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.0% | +18.6% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +26.4% | +22.7% |
| Ahead or behind | −5.4 pts | −4.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 100% | 93% |
| Age | 2692 days | 4820 days |
RYLD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, RYLD paid 12.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 7.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.0%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +26.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.4 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 12.2%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
XYLD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, XYLD paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.6%. All-country world (ACWI) returned +22.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.1 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 9.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, RYLD or XYLD?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, RYLD paid 12.4% of its starting price in cash and XYLD paid 11.1%, so RYLD paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, RYLD or XYLD?
- With every distribution reinvested, RYLD returned +21.0% and XYLD returned +18.6% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so RYLD returned more.
- Which is cheaper, RYLD or XYLD?
- RYLD charges 0.60% a year and XYLD charges 0.60%, so RYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, RYLD against XYLD, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/RYLD-XYLD.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.