Which paid more, QQQI or XYLD?

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QQQI paid 14.4% of its starting price in cash and XYLD paid 11.1%, so QQQI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, QQQI or XYLD?

With every distribution reinvested, QQQI returned +18.7% and XYLD returned +18.6% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so QQQI returned more.

Which is cheaper, QQQI or XYLD?

QQQI charges 0.68% a year and XYLD charges 0.60%, so XYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.

QQQI vs XYLD

Name: ETFIQ comparison of QQQI and XYLD
Creator: ETFIQ

NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF, side by side on the income desk.

Open the live comparison on ETFIQ

QQQI and XYLD on the income desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF	XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
Issuer	NEOS	Global X
Strategy	covered call	covered call
Benchmark	Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)	All-country world (ACWI)
Pays	monthly	monthly
Payout rate, annualised	14.3%	9.0%
Expense ratio	0.68%	0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year	14.4%	11.1%
Price change, 1 year	+3.1%	+6.5%
Total return, 1 year	+18.7%	+18.6%
Benchmark return, 1 year	+25.6%	+22.7%
Ahead or behind	−6.9 pts	−4.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate	98%	93%
Age	948 days	4820 days

QQQI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QQQI paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.9 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 14.3%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).

XYLD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, XYLD paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.6%. All-country world (ACWI) returned +22.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.1 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 9.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QQQI or XYLD?: Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QQQI paid 14.4% of its starting price in cash and XYLD paid 11.1%, so QQQI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QQQI or XYLD?: With every distribution reinvested, QQQI returned +18.7% and XYLD returned +18.6% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so QQQI returned more.
Which is cheaper, QQQI or XYLD?: QQQI charges 0.68% a year and XYLD charges 0.60%, so XYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQI against XYLD, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/QQQI-XYLD.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; every figure here is stated arithmetic on published data. Standards and sources