Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
QQQI vs XDTE
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QQQI and XDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in QQQI | Only in XDTE |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 7.66% | Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 100.00% |
| Apple Inc 6.63% | |
| Micron Technology Inc 5.61% | |
| Microsoft Corp 4.38% | |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.12% | |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.05% | |
| Tesla Inc 3.35% | |
| Alphabet Inc 3.32% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQI | XDTE | QQQI | XDTE | QQQI | XDTE | |
| 3 months | +2.9% | +5.1% | 3.5% | 5.0% | +0.8 pts | +0.4 pts |
| 6 months | +13.4% | +11.7% | 7.4% | 10.3% | −6.8 pts | −3.4 pts |
| 1 year | +18.7% | +18.7% | 14.4% | 27.3% | −6.9 pts | −1.2 pts |
| Since launch | +58.8% | +46.6% | 38.6% | 59.0% | −12.6 pts | −7.5 pts |
| QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF | XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | NEOS | Roundhill |
| Strategy | covered call | 0DTE covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 14.3% | 20.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.68% | 0.97% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 14.4% | 27.3% |
| Price change, 1 year | +3.1% | −11.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.7% | +18.7% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +25.6% | +20.0% |
| Ahead or behind | −6.9 pts | −1.2 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 98% | not published |
| Age | 948 days | 911 days |
QQQI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QQQI paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.9 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 14.3%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
XDTE in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, XDTE paid 27.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +20.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.2 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 20.0%, paid weekly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, QQQI or XDTE?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QQQI paid 14.4% of its starting price in cash and XDTE paid 27.3%, so XDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, QQQI or XDTE?
- With every distribution reinvested, QQQI returned +18.7% and XDTE returned +18.7% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so XDTE returned more.
- Which is cheaper, QQQI or XDTE?
- QQQI charges 0.68% a year and XDTE charges 0.97%, so QQQI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQI against XDTE, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/QQQI-XDTE.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.