Which paid more, QDTE or ULTY?

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QDTE paid 37.4% of its starting price in cash and ULTY paid 48.3%, so ULTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, QDTE or ULTY?

With every distribution reinvested, QDTE returned +24.7% and ULTY returned −2.9% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so QDTE returned more.

Which is cheaper, QDTE or ULTY?

QDTE charges 0.96% a year and ULTY charges 1.30%, so QDTE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.

QDTE vs ULTY

Name: ETFIQ comparison of QDTE and ULTY
Creator: ETFIQ

Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF and YieldMax(R) Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF, side by side on the income desk.

Open the live comparison on ETFIQ

QDTE and ULTY on the income desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	ULTY YieldMax(R) Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
Issuer	Roundhill	YieldMax
Strategy	0DTE covered call	synthetic covered call
Benchmark	Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)	S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Pays	weekly	weekly
Payout rate, annualised	25.1%	60.4%
Expense ratio	0.96%	1.30%
Cash paid, 1 year	37.4%	48.3%
Price change, 1 year	−17.0%	−52.1%
Total return, 1 year	+24.7%	−2.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year	+25.6%	+20.0%
Ahead or behind	−0.9 pts	−22.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate	not published	100%
Age	911 days	918 days

QDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QDTE paid 37.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 17.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +24.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 25.1%, paid weekly.

ULTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, ULTY paid 48.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 52.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −2.9%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +20.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 22.8 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 60.4%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QDTE or ULTY?: Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QDTE paid 37.4% of its starting price in cash and ULTY paid 48.3%, so ULTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QDTE or ULTY?: With every distribution reinvested, QDTE returned +24.7% and ULTY returned −2.9% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so QDTE returned more.
Which is cheaper, QDTE or ULTY?: QDTE charges 0.96% a year and ULTY charges 1.30%, so QDTE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QDTE against ULTY, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/QDTE-ULTY.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; every figure here is stated arithmetic on published data. Standards and sources