Which paid more, OARK or XDTE?

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, OARK paid 39.3% of its starting price in cash and XDTE paid 27.3%, so OARK paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, OARK or XDTE?

With every distribution reinvested, OARK returned +13.3% and XDTE returned +18.7% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so XDTE returned more.

Which is cheaper, OARK or XDTE?

OARK charges 1.00% a year and XDTE charges 0.97%, so XDTE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.

OARK vs XDTE

Name: ETFIQ comparison of OARK and XDTE
Creator: ETFIQ

YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF, side by side on the income desk.

Open the live comparison on ETFIQ

OARK and XDTE on the income desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	OARK YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF	XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
Issuer	YieldMax	Roundhill
Strategy	synthetic covered call	0DTE covered call
Benchmark	Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy	S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays	weekly	weekly
Payout rate, annualised	40.3%	20.0%
Expense ratio	1.00%	0.97%
Cash paid, 1 year	39.3%	27.3%
Price change, 1 year	−29.0%	−11.3%
Total return, 1 year	+13.3%	+18.7%
Benchmark return, 1 year	+25.6%	+20.0%
Ahead or behind	−12.3 pts	−1.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate	78%	not published
Age	1381 days	911 days

OARK in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, OARK paid 39.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 29.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.3 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 40.3%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 78% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).

XDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, XDTE paid 27.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +20.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.2 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 20.0%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, OARK or XDTE?: Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, OARK paid 39.3% of its starting price in cash and XDTE paid 27.3%, so OARK paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, OARK or XDTE?: With every distribution reinvested, OARK returned +13.3% and XDTE returned +18.7% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so XDTE returned more.
Which is cheaper, OARK or XDTE?: OARK charges 1.00% a year and XDTE charges 0.97%, so XDTE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Cite this page. ETFIQ, OARK against XDTE, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/OARK-XDTE.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; every figure here is stated arithmetic on published data. Standards and sources