Which paid more, OARK or QDTE?

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, OARK paid 39.3% of its starting price in cash and QDTE paid 37.4%, so OARK paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, OARK or QDTE?

With every distribution reinvested, OARK returned +13.3% and QDTE returned +24.7% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so QDTE returned more.

Which is cheaper, OARK or QDTE?

OARK charges 1.00% a year and QDTE charges 0.96%, so QDTE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.

OARK vs QDTE

Name: ETFIQ comparison of OARK and QDTE
Creator: ETFIQ

YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF, side by side on the income desk.

Open the live comparison on ETFIQ

OARK and QDTE on the income desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	OARK YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF	QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
Issuer	YieldMax	Roundhill
Strategy	synthetic covered call	0DTE covered call
Benchmark	Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy	Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Pays	weekly	weekly
Payout rate, annualised	40.3%	25.1%
Expense ratio	1.00%	0.96%
Cash paid, 1 year	39.3%	37.4%
Price change, 1 year	−29.0%	−17.0%
Total return, 1 year	+13.3%	+24.7%
Benchmark return, 1 year	+25.6%	+25.6%
Ahead or behind	−12.3 pts	−0.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate	78%	not published
Age	1381 days	911 days

OARK in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, OARK paid 39.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 29.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.3 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 40.3%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 78% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).

QDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QDTE paid 37.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 17.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +24.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 25.1%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, OARK or QDTE?: Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, OARK paid 39.3% of its starting price in cash and QDTE paid 37.4%, so OARK paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, OARK or QDTE?: With every distribution reinvested, OARK returned +13.3% and QDTE returned +24.7% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so QDTE returned more.
Which is cheaper, OARK or QDTE?: OARK charges 1.00% a year and QDTE charges 0.96%, so QDTE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Cite this page. ETFIQ, OARK against QDTE, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/OARK-QDTE.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; every figure here is stated arithmetic on published data. Standards and sources