Which paid more, NVDY or QDTE?

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, NVDY paid 44.4% of its starting price in cash and QDTE paid 37.4%, so NVDY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, NVDY or QDTE?

With every distribution reinvested, NVDY returned +30.9% and QDTE returned +24.7% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so NVDY returned more.

Which is cheaper, NVDY or QDTE?

NVDY charges 1.09% a year and QDTE charges 0.96%, so QDTE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.

NVDY vs QDTE

Name: ETFIQ comparison of NVDY and QDTE
Creator: ETFIQ

YieldMax(R) NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF, side by side on the income desk.

Open the live comparison on ETFIQ

NVDY and QDTE on the income desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	NVDY YieldMax(R) NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF	QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
Issuer	YieldMax	Roundhill
Strategy	synthetic covered call	0DTE covered call
Benchmark	NVIDIA (NVDA)	Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Pays	weekly	weekly
Payout rate, annualised	38.6%	25.1%
Expense ratio	1.09%	0.96%
Cash paid, 1 year	44.4%	37.4%
Price change, 1 year	−21.3%	−17.0%
Total return, 1 year	+30.9%	+24.7%
Benchmark return, 1 year	+34.4%	+25.6%
Ahead or behind	−3.5 pts	−0.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate	94%	not published
Age	1212 days	911 days

NVDY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, NVDY paid 44.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 21.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +30.9%. NVIDIA (NVDA) returned +34.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.5 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 38.6%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).

QDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QDTE paid 37.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 17.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +24.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 25.1%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, NVDY or QDTE?: Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, NVDY paid 44.4% of its starting price in cash and QDTE paid 37.4%, so NVDY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, NVDY or QDTE?: With every distribution reinvested, NVDY returned +30.9% and QDTE returned +24.7% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so NVDY returned more.
Which is cheaper, NVDY or QDTE?: NVDY charges 1.09% a year and QDTE charges 0.96%, so QDTE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Cite this page. ETFIQ, NVDY against QDTE, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/NVDY-QDTE.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; every figure here is stated arithmetic on published data. Standards and sources