ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.

MSTY vs RYLD

YieldMax(R) MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF, side by side on the income desk.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MSTY and RYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MSTYOnly in RYLD
TREASURY BILL 21.68%Global X Russell 2000 ETF 100.00%
TREASURY BILL 21.18%N/A 0.00%
TREASURY BILL 20.64%N/A 0.00%
TREASURY BILL 17.38%N/A 0.00%
TREASURY BILL 15.04%N/A 0.00%
TREASURY BILL 4.07%N/A 0.00%
Strategy Inc 0.01%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jan 31, 2026.

Performance, window by window

MSTY and RYLD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
MSTYRYLDMSTYRYLDMSTYRYLD
3 months+14.6%+7.0%15.8%3.1%−4.0 pts+1.7 pts
6 months+4.2%+13.5%33.4%6.2%−2.7 pts−5.0 pts
1 year−50.8%+21.0%35.0%12.4%+5.7 pts−5.4 pts
3 yearsn/a+33.0%n/a32.7%n/a−31.2 pts
Since launch+67.6%+54.7%222.8%67.2%−32.6 pts−54.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MSTY and RYLD on the income desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MSTY
YieldMax(R) MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
IssuerYieldMaxGlobal X
Strategysynthetic covered callcovered call
BenchmarkMicroStrategy (MSTR)Russell 2000 (IWM)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualised68.2%12.2%
Expense rationot published0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year35.0%12.4%
Price change, 1 year−79.0%+7.3%
Total return, 1 year−50.8%+21.0%
Benchmark return, 1 year−56.4%+26.4%
Ahead or behind+5.7 pts−5.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate99%100%
Age925 days2692 days

MSTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, MSTY paid 35.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 79.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −50.8%. MicroStrategy (MSTR) returned −56.4% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.7 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 68.2%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).

RYLD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, RYLD paid 12.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 7.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.0%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +26.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.4 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 12.2%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, MSTY or RYLD?
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, MSTY paid 35.0% of its starting price in cash and RYLD paid 12.4%, so MSTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, MSTY or RYLD?
With every distribution reinvested, MSTY returned −50.8% and RYLD returned +21.0% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so RYLD returned more.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MSTY against RYLD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MSTY against RYLD, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/MSTY-RYLD.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources