Which paid more, MSFO or OARK?

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, MSFO paid 27.9% of its starting price in cash and OARK paid 39.3%, so OARK paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, MSFO or OARK?

With every distribution reinvested, MSFO returned +0.3% and OARK returned +13.3% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so OARK returned more.

Which is cheaper, MSFO or OARK?

MSFO charges 1.03% a year and OARK charges 1.00%, so OARK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.

MSFO vs OARK

Name: ETFIQ comparison of MSFO and OARK
Creator: ETFIQ

YieldMax(R) MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF and YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF, side by side on the income desk.

Open the live comparison on ETFIQ

MSFO and OARK on the income desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MSFO YieldMax(R) MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF	OARK YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF
Issuer	YieldMax	YieldMax
Strategy	synthetic covered call	synthetic covered call
Benchmark	Microsoft (MSFT)	Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy
Pays	weekly	weekly
Payout rate, annualised	41.2%	40.3%
Expense ratio	1.03%	1.00%
Cash paid, 1 year	27.9%	39.3%
Price change, 1 year	−30.3%	−29.0%
Total return, 1 year	+0.3%	+13.3%
Benchmark return, 1 year	−0.8%	+25.6%
Ahead or behind	+1.1 pts	−12.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate	95%	78%
Age	1106 days	1381 days

MSFO in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, MSFO paid 27.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 30.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.3%. Microsoft (MSFT) returned −0.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.1 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 41.2%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).

OARK in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, OARK paid 39.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 29.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.3 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 40.3%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 78% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, MSFO or OARK?: Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, MSFO paid 27.9% of its starting price in cash and OARK paid 39.3%, so OARK paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, MSFO or OARK?: With every distribution reinvested, MSFO returned +0.3% and OARK returned +13.3% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so OARK returned more.
Which is cheaper, MSFO or OARK?: MSFO charges 1.03% a year and OARK charges 1.00%, so OARK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MSFO against OARK, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/MSFO-OARK.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; every figure here is stated arithmetic on published data. Standards and sources