Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
MSFO vs OARK
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MSFO and OARK hold 88% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | MSFO | OARK |
|---|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL | 31.42% | 37.81% |
| TREASURY BILL | 32.44% | 30.32% |
| TREASURY BILL | 14.95% | 18.55% |
| TREASURY BILL | 8.72% | 10.80% |
| TREASURY BILL | 12.47% | 2.51% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSFO | OARK | MSFO | OARK | MSFO | OARK | |
| 3 months | +16.0% | +9.3% | 11.2% | 9.7% | −4.2 pts | +7.2 pts |
| 6 months | +18.9% | +14.7% | 20.6% | 22.1% | −3.8 pts | −5.5 pts |
| 1 year | +0.3% | +13.3% | 27.9% | 39.3% | +1.1 pts | −12.3 pts |
| 3 years | +51.3% | +54.1% | 78.8% | 84.0% | −2.1 pts | −39.4 pts |
| Since launch | +55.5% | +57.2% | 81.0% | 89.0% | −2.8 pts | −97.4 pts |
| MSFO YieldMax(R) MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF | OARK YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | YieldMax | YieldMax |
| Strategy | synthetic covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | Microsoft (MSFT) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy |
| Pays | weekly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 41.2% | 40.3% |
| Expense ratio | 1.03% | 1.00% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 27.9% | 39.3% |
| Price change, 1 year | −30.3% | −29.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +0.3% | +13.3% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −0.8% | +25.6% |
| Ahead or behind | +1.1 pts | −12.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 95% | 78% |
| Age | 1106 days | 1381 days |
MSFO in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, MSFO paid 27.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 30.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.3%. Microsoft (MSFT) returned −0.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.1 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 41.2%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
OARK in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, OARK paid 39.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 29.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.3 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 40.3%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 78% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, MSFO or OARK?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, MSFO paid 27.9% of its starting price in cash and OARK paid 39.3%, so OARK paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, MSFO or OARK?
- With every distribution reinvested, MSFO returned +0.3% and OARK returned +13.3% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so OARK returned more.
- Which is cheaper, MSFO or OARK?
- MSFO charges 1.03% a year and OARK charges 1.00%, so OARK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MSFO against OARK, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/MSFO-OARK.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.