Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
JEPQ vs MSFO
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JEPQ and MSFO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in JEPQ | Only in MSFO |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp. 6.68% | TREASURY BILL 32.44% |
| Apple, Inc. 5.83% | TREASURY BILL 31.42% |
| Micron Technology, Inc. 5.58% | TREASURY BILL 14.95% |
| Alphabet, Inc. 5.05% | TREASURY BILL 12.47% |
| Microsoft Corp. 3.90% | TREASURY BILL 8.72% |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 3.87% | |
| Amazon.com, Inc. 3.67% | |
| Lam Research Corp. 2.89% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JEPQ | MSFO | JEPQ | MSFO | JEPQ | MSFO | |
| 3 months | +5.2% | +16.0% | 3.4% | 11.2% | +3.1 pts | −4.2 pts |
| 6 months | +12.2% | +18.9% | 6.6% | 20.6% | −8.0 pts | −3.8 pts |
| 1 year | +20.7% | +0.3% | 12.2% | 27.9% | −4.9 pts | +1.1 pts |
| 3 years | +70.7% | +51.3% | 36.9% | 78.8% | −22.8 pts | −2.1 pts |
| Since launch | +90.5% | +55.5% | 49.2% | 81.0% | −33.5 pts | −2.8 pts |
| JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | MSFO YieldMax(R) MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | JPMorgan | YieldMax |
| Strategy | covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | Microsoft (MSFT) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 13.7% | 41.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 1.03% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 12.2% | 27.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | +7.6% | −30.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.7% | +0.3% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +25.6% | −0.8% |
| Ahead or behind | −4.9 pts | +1.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 95% |
| Age | 1584 days | 1106 days |
JEPQ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, JEPQ paid 12.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 7.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 13.7%, paid monthly.
MSFO in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, MSFO paid 27.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 30.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.3%. Microsoft (MSFT) returned −0.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.1 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 41.2%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, JEPQ or MSFO?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, JEPQ paid 12.2% of its starting price in cash and MSFO paid 27.9%, so MSFO paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, JEPQ or MSFO?
- With every distribution reinvested, JEPQ returned +20.7% and MSFO returned +0.3% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so JEPQ returned more.
- Which is cheaper, JEPQ or MSFO?
- JEPQ charges 0.35% a year and MSFO charges 1.03%, so JEPQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, JEPQ against MSFO, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/JEPQ-MSFO.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.