Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
GPIX vs OARK
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF and YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF, side by side on the income desk.
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ| GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | OARK YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Goldman Sachs | YieldMax |
| Strategy | covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 8.5% | 40.3% |
| Expense ratio | not published | 1.00% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 8.9% | 39.3% |
| Price change, 1 year | +9.8% | −29.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.5% | +13.3% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +20.0% | +25.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.4 pts | −12.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 78% |
| Age | 1044 days | 1381 days |
GPIX in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, GPIX paid 8.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +20.0% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 8.5%, paid monthly.
OARK in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, OARK paid 39.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 29.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.3 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 40.3%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 78% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, GPIX or OARK?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, GPIX paid 8.9% of its starting price in cash and OARK paid 39.3%, so OARK paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, GPIX or OARK?
- With every distribution reinvested, GPIX returned +19.5% and OARK returned +13.3% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so GPIX returned more.
Other comparisons
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPIX against OARK, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/GPIX-OARK.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; every figure here is stated arithmetic on published data. Standards and sources