ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.

GPIX vs OARK

Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF and YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF, side by side on the income desk.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GPIX and OARK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GPIXOnly in OARK
NVIDIA CORP 7.33%TREASURY BILL 37.81%
APPLE INC 6.47%TREASURY BILL 30.32%
ALPHABET INC 4.37%TREASURY BILL 18.55%
MICROSOFT CORP 3.90%TREASURY BILL 10.80%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.39%TREASURY BILL 2.51%
BROADCOM INC 2.80%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 2.02%
TESLA INC 1.89%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

GPIX and OARK over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
GPIXOARKGPIXOARKGPIXOARK
3 months+4.9%+9.3%2.2%9.7%+0.2 pts+7.2 pts
6 months+13.8%+14.7%4.5%22.1%−1.3 pts−5.5 pts
1 year+19.5%+13.3%8.9%39.3%−0.4 pts−12.3 pts
3 yearsn/a+54.1%n/a84.0%n/a−39.4 pts
Since launch+81.7%+57.2%30.5%89.0%−11.4 pts−97.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GPIX and OARK on the income desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
OARK
YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF
IssuerGoldman SachsYieldMax
Strategycovered callsynthetic covered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualised8.5%40.3%
Expense rationot published1.00%
Cash paid, 1 year8.9%39.3%
Price change, 1 year+9.8%−29.0%
Total return, 1 year+19.5%+13.3%
Benchmark return, 1 year+20.0%+25.6%
Ahead or behind−0.4 pts−12.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published78%
Age1044 days1381 days

GPIX in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, GPIX paid 8.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +20.0% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 8.5%, paid monthly.

OARK in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, OARK paid 39.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 29.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.3 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 40.3%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 78% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, GPIX or OARK?
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, GPIX paid 8.9% of its starting price in cash and OARK paid 39.3%, so OARK paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, GPIX or OARK?
With every distribution reinvested, GPIX returned +19.5% and OARK returned +13.3% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so GPIX returned more.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GPIX against OARK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPIX against OARK, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/GPIX-OARK.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources