ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.

GPIX vs MSFO

Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF and YieldMax(R) MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF, side by side on the income desk.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GPIX and MSFO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GPIXOnly in MSFO
NVIDIA CORP 7.33%TREASURY BILL 32.44%
APPLE INC 6.47%TREASURY BILL 31.42%
ALPHABET INC 4.37%TREASURY BILL 14.95%
MICROSOFT CORP 3.90%TREASURY BILL 12.47%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.39%TREASURY BILL 8.72%
BROADCOM INC 2.80%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 2.02%
TESLA INC 1.89%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

GPIX and MSFO over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
GPIXMSFOGPIXMSFOGPIXMSFO
3 months+4.9%+16.0%2.2%11.2%+0.2 pts−4.2 pts
6 months+13.8%+18.9%4.5%20.6%−1.3 pts−3.8 pts
1 year+19.5%+0.3%8.9%27.9%−0.4 pts+1.1 pts
3 yearsn/a+51.3%n/a78.8%n/a−2.1 pts
Since launch+81.7%+55.5%30.5%81.0%−11.4 pts−2.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GPIX and MSFO on the income desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
MSFO
YieldMax(R) MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
IssuerGoldman SachsYieldMax
Strategycovered callsynthetic covered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)Microsoft (MSFT)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualised8.5%41.2%
Expense rationot published1.03%
Cash paid, 1 year8.9%27.9%
Price change, 1 year+9.8%−30.3%
Total return, 1 year+19.5%+0.3%
Benchmark return, 1 year+20.0%−0.8%
Ahead or behind−0.4 pts+1.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published95%
Age1044 days1106 days

GPIX in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, GPIX paid 8.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +20.0% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 8.5%, paid monthly.

MSFO in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, MSFO paid 27.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 30.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.3%. Microsoft (MSFT) returned −0.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.1 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 41.2%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, GPIX or MSFO?
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, GPIX paid 8.9% of its starting price in cash and MSFO paid 27.9%, so MSFO paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, GPIX or MSFO?
With every distribution reinvested, GPIX returned +19.5% and MSFO returned +0.3% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so GPIX returned more.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GPIX against MSFO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPIX against MSFO, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/GPIX-MSFO.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources