Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
GPIX vs JEPQ
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GPIX and JEPQ hold 46% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | GPIX | JEPQ |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 7.33% | 6.68% |
| APPLE INC | 6.47% | 5.83% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 3.90% | 3.90% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 3.39% | 3.67% |
| BROADCOM INC | 2.80% | 2.16% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 2.02% | 5.58% |
| TESLA INC | 1.89% | 2.39% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 1.67% | 2.38% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC | 1.48% | 3.87% |
| ALPHABET INC | 1.46% | 5.05% |
| INTEL CORP | 1.02% | 1.62% |
| APPLIED MATERIALS INC | 0.90% | 1.31% |
| Only in GPIX | Only in JEPQ |
|---|---|
| ALPHABET INC 4.37% | Seagate Technology Holdings plc 1.93% |
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 1.51% | Citigroup Global Markets Holdings, Inc. 1.14% |
| ELI LILLY & COMPANY 1.48% | Toronto-Dominion Bank (The) 1.14% |
| JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 1.36% | BNP Paribas Issuance BV 1.14% |
| VISA INC 0.99% | Royal Bank of Canada 1.13% |
| EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 0.96% | ASML Holding NV 1.13% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.95% | BNP Paribas Issuance BV 1.13% |
| CATERPILLAR INC 0.78% | Royal Bank of Canada 1.13% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPIX | JEPQ | GPIX | JEPQ | GPIX | JEPQ | |
| 3 months | +4.9% | +5.2% | 2.2% | 3.4% | +0.2 pts | +3.1 pts |
| 6 months | +13.8% | +12.2% | 4.5% | 6.6% | −1.3 pts | −8.0 pts |
| 1 year | +19.5% | +20.7% | 8.9% | 12.2% | −0.4 pts | −4.9 pts |
| 3 years | n/a | +70.7% | n/a | 36.9% | n/a | −22.8 pts |
| Since launch | +81.7% | +90.5% | 30.5% | 49.2% | −11.4 pts | −33.5 pts |
| GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Goldman Sachs | JPMorgan |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 8.5% | 13.7% |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.35% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 8.9% | 12.2% |
| Price change, 1 year | +9.8% | +7.6% |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.5% | +20.7% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +20.0% | +25.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.4 pts | −4.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1044 days | 1584 days |
GPIX in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, GPIX paid 8.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +20.0% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 8.5%, paid monthly.
JEPQ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, JEPQ paid 12.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 7.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 13.7%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, GPIX or JEPQ?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, GPIX paid 8.9% of its starting price in cash and JEPQ paid 12.2%, so JEPQ paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, GPIX or JEPQ?
- With every distribution reinvested, GPIX returned +19.5% and JEPQ returned +20.7% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so JEPQ returned more.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPIX against JEPQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/GPIX-JEPQ.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.