Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
GPIX vs JEPI
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GPIX and JEPI hold 32% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | GPIX | JEPI |
|---|---|---|
| APPLE INC | 6.47% | 1.53% |
| NVIDIA CORP | 7.33% | 1.53% |
| ALPHABET INC | 4.37% | 1.52% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 3.39% | 1.48% |
| BROADCOM INC | 2.80% | 1.33% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 3.90% | 1.30% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 1.67% | 1.22% |
| ELI LILLY & COMPANY | 1.48% | 1.05% |
| VISA INC | 0.99% | 1.42% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON | 0.95% | 1.68% |
| LAM RESEARCH CORP | 0.86% | 1.57% |
| WALMART INC | 0.83% | 0.92% |
| Only in GPIX | Only in JEPI |
|---|---|
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 2.02% | Eaton Corp. plc 1.64% |
| TESLA INC 1.89% | Trane Technologies plc 1.62% |
| ALPHABET INC 1.46% | BNP Paribas Issuance BV 0.97% |
| JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 1.36% | BNP Paribas Issuance BV 0.96% |
| INTEL CORP 1.02% | National Bank of Canada 0.95% |
| APPLIED MATERIALS INC 0.90% | Barclays Bank plc 0.95% |
| CATERPILLAR INC 0.78% | BNP Paribas Issuance BV 0.94% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS INC 0.73% | Citigroup Global Markets Holdings, Inc. 0.94% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPIX | JEPI | GPIX | JEPI | GPIX | JEPI | |
| 3 months | +4.9% | +5.1% | 2.2% | 2.0% | +0.2 pts | +0.4 pts |
| 6 months | +13.8% | +2.7% | 4.5% | 4.1% | −1.3 pts | −12.4 pts |
| 1 year | +19.5% | +9.2% | 8.9% | 8.1% | −0.4 pts | −10.7 pts |
| 3 years | n/a | +31.9% | n/a | 24.6% | n/a | −46.0 pts |
| Since launch | +81.7% | +96.0% | 30.5% | 60.9% | −11.4 pts | −89.0 pts |
| GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Goldman Sachs | JPMorgan |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 8.5% | 7.8% |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.35% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 8.9% | 8.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | +9.8% | +0.8% |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.5% | +9.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +20.0% | +20.0% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.4 pts | −10.7 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1044 days | 2297 days |
GPIX in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, GPIX paid 8.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +20.0% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 8.5%, paid monthly.
JEPI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, JEPI paid 8.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +20.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.7 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 7.8%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, GPIX or JEPI?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, GPIX paid 8.9% of its starting price in cash and JEPI paid 8.1%, so GPIX paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, GPIX or JEPI?
- With every distribution reinvested, GPIX returned +19.5% and JEPI returned +9.2% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so GPIX returned more.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPIX against JEPI, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/GPIX-JEPI.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.