Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
GPIQ vs RYLD
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF, side by side on the income desk.
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ| GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF | RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Goldman Sachs | Global X |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | Russell 2000 (IWM) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 10.5% | 12.2% |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.60% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 11.3% | 12.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +11.8% | +7.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +24.2% | +21.0% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +25.6% | +26.4% |
| Ahead or behind | −1.4 pts | −5.4 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 100% |
| Age | 1044 days | 2692 days |
GPIQ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 11.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +24.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 10.5%, paid monthly.
RYLD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, RYLD paid 12.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 7.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.0%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +26.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.4 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 12.2%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, GPIQ or RYLD?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.3% of its starting price in cash and RYLD paid 12.4%, so RYLD paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, GPIQ or RYLD?
- With every distribution reinvested, GPIQ returned +24.2% and RYLD returned +21.0% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so GPIQ returned more.
Other comparisons
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPIQ against RYLD, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/GPIQ-RYLD.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; every figure here is stated arithmetic on published data. Standards and sources