Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
GPIQ vs RYLD
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GPIQ and RYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in GPIQ | Only in RYLD |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 7.48% | Global X Russell 2000 ETF 100.00% |
| APPLE INC 6.59% | N/A 0.00% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 5.62% | N/A 0.00% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 4.20% | N/A 0.00% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 4.11% | N/A 0.00% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 3.96% | N/A 0.00% |
| ALPHABET INC 3.54% | |
| TESLA INC 3.17% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPIQ | RYLD | GPIQ | RYLD | GPIQ | RYLD | |
| 3 months | +2.4% | +7.0% | 2.6% | 3.1% | +0.3 pts | +1.7 pts |
| 6 months | +17.1% | +13.5% | 5.8% | 6.2% | −3.1 pts | −5.0 pts |
| 1 year | +24.2% | +21.0% | 11.3% | 12.4% | −1.4 pts | −5.4 pts |
| 3 years | n/a | +33.0% | n/a | 32.7% | n/a | −31.2 pts |
| Since launch | +97.4% | +54.7% | 38.2% | 67.2% | −15.2 pts | −54.1 pts |
| GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF | RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Goldman Sachs | Global X |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | Russell 2000 (IWM) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 10.5% | 12.2% |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.60% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 11.3% | 12.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +11.8% | +7.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +24.2% | +21.0% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +25.6% | +26.4% |
| Ahead or behind | −1.4 pts | −5.4 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 100% |
| Age | 1044 days | 2692 days |
GPIQ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 11.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +24.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 10.5%, paid monthly.
RYLD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, RYLD paid 12.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 7.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.0%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +26.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.4 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 12.2%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, GPIQ or RYLD?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.3% of its starting price in cash and RYLD paid 12.4%, so RYLD paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, GPIQ or RYLD?
- With every distribution reinvested, GPIQ returned +24.2% and RYLD returned +21.0% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so GPIQ returned more.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPIQ against RYLD, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/GPIQ-RYLD.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.