Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
GPIQ vs OARK
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GPIQ and OARK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in GPIQ | Only in OARK |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 7.48% | TREASURY BILL 37.81% |
| APPLE INC 6.59% | TREASURY BILL 30.32% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 5.62% | TREASURY BILL 18.55% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 4.20% | TREASURY BILL 10.80% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 4.11% | TREASURY BILL 2.51% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 3.96% | |
| ALPHABET INC 3.54% | |
| TESLA INC 3.17% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPIQ | OARK | GPIQ | OARK | GPIQ | OARK | |
| 3 months | +2.4% | +9.3% | 2.6% | 9.7% | +0.3 pts | +7.2 pts |
| 6 months | +17.1% | +14.7% | 5.8% | 22.1% | −3.1 pts | −5.5 pts |
| 1 year | +24.2% | +13.3% | 11.3% | 39.3% | −1.4 pts | −12.3 pts |
| 3 years | n/a | +54.1% | n/a | 84.0% | n/a | −39.4 pts |
| Since launch | +97.4% | +57.2% | 38.2% | 89.0% | −15.2 pts | −97.4 pts |
| GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF | OARK YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Goldman Sachs | YieldMax |
| Strategy | covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 10.5% | 40.3% |
| Expense ratio | not published | 1.00% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 11.3% | 39.3% |
| Price change, 1 year | +11.8% | −29.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +24.2% | +13.3% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +25.6% | +25.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −1.4 pts | −12.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 78% |
| Age | 1044 days | 1381 days |
GPIQ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 11.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +24.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 10.5%, paid monthly.
OARK in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, OARK paid 39.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 29.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.3 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 40.3%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 78% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, GPIQ or OARK?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.3% of its starting price in cash and OARK paid 39.3%, so OARK paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, GPIQ or OARK?
- With every distribution reinvested, GPIQ returned +24.2% and OARK returned +13.3% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so GPIQ returned more.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPIQ against OARK, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/GPIQ-OARK.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.