ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.

FEPI vs MSTY

REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF and YieldMax(R) MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF, side by side on the income desk.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FEPI and MSTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FEPIOnly in MSTY
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 9.98%TREASURY BILL 21.68%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 8.91%TREASURY BILL 21.18%
ALPHABET INC. 8.83%TREASURY BILL 20.64%
BROADCOM INC. 8.05%TREASURY BILL 17.38%
NVIDIA CORPORATION 7.76%TREASURY BILL 15.04%
TESLA, INC. 7.47%TREASURY BILL 4.07%
INTEL CORPORATION 5.24%Strategy Inc 0.01%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 5.21%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jan 31, 2026.

Performance, window by window

FEPI and MSTY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
FEPIMSTYFEPIMSTYFEPIMSTY
3 months+2.7%+14.6%6.0%15.8%+0.6 pts−4.0 pts
6 months+14.8%+4.2%11.7%33.4%−5.3 pts−2.7 pts
1 year+17.8%−50.8%23.2%35.0%−7.8 pts+5.7 pts
Since launch+66.6%+67.6%66.0%222.8%−30.1 pts−32.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
FEPI and MSTY on the income desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FEPI
REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF
MSTY
YieldMax(R) MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
IssuerREXYieldMax
Strategycovered callsynthetic covered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxyMicroStrategy (MSTR)
Paysweeklyweekly
Payout rate, annualised25.1%68.2%
Expense ratio0.65%not published
Cash paid, 1 year23.2%35.0%
Price change, 1 year−7.5%−79.0%
Total return, 1 year+17.8%−50.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+25.6%−56.4%
Ahead or behind−7.8 pts+5.7 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published99%
Age1059 days925 days

FEPI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, FEPI paid 23.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 7.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.8%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.8 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 25.1%, paid weekly.

MSTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, MSTY paid 35.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 79.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −50.8%. MicroStrategy (MSTR) returned −56.4% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.7 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 68.2%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FEPI or MSTY?
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, FEPI paid 23.2% of its starting price in cash and MSTY paid 35.0%, so MSTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FEPI or MSTY?
With every distribution reinvested, FEPI returned +17.8% and MSTY returned −50.8% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so FEPI returned more.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FEPI against MSTY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FEPI against MSTY, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/FEPI-MSTY.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources