Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
FEPI vs GOOY
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FEPI and GOOY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FEPI | Only in GOOY |
|---|---|
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 9.98% | TREASURY BILL 23.75% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 8.91% | TREASURY BILL 22.86% |
| ALPHABET INC. 8.83% | TREASURY BILL 21.83% |
| BROADCOM INC. 8.05% | TREASURY BILL 20.83% |
| NVIDIA CORPORATION 7.76% | TREASURY BILL 10.73% |
| TESLA, INC. 7.47% | |
| INTEL CORPORATION 5.24% | |
| AMAZON.COM, INC. 5.21% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FEPI | GOOY | FEPI | GOOY | FEPI | GOOY | |
| 3 months | +2.7% | −7.1% | 6.0% | 7.3% | +0.6 pts | +0.9 pts |
| 6 months | +14.8% | +10.6% | 11.7% | 21.3% | −5.3 pts | −3.0 pts |
| 1 year | +17.8% | +35.5% | 23.2% | 45.5% | −7.8 pts | −10.7 pts |
| 3 years | n/a | +79.0% | n/a | 81.2% | n/a | −72.7 pts |
| Since launch | +66.6% | +80.2% | 66.0% | 81.8% | −30.1 pts | −77.5 pts |
| FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF | GOOY YieldMax(R) GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | REX | YieldMax |
| Strategy | covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy | Alphabet (GOOGL) |
| Pays | weekly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 25.1% | 28.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 1.14% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 23.2% | 45.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | −7.5% | −12.9% |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.8% | +35.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +25.6% | +46.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −7.8 pts | −10.7 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 2% |
| Age | 1059 days | 1134 days |
FEPI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, FEPI paid 23.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 7.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.8%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.8 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 25.1%, paid weekly.
GOOY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, GOOY paid 45.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +35.5%. Alphabet (GOOGL) returned +46.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.7 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 28.7%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 2% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, FEPI or GOOY?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, FEPI paid 23.2% of its starting price in cash and GOOY paid 45.5%, so GOOY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, FEPI or GOOY?
- With every distribution reinvested, FEPI returned +17.8% and GOOY returned +35.5% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so GOOY returned more.
- Which is cheaper, FEPI or GOOY?
- FEPI charges 0.65% a year and GOOY charges 1.14%, so FEPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FEPI against GOOY, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/FEPI-GOOY.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.