Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
CONY vs GPIQ
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CONY and GPIQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CONY | Only in GPIQ |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 37.96% | NVIDIA CORP 7.48% |
| TREASURY BILL 25.76% | APPLE INC 6.59% |
| TREASURY BILL 25.29% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 5.62% |
| TREASURY BILL 7.55% | AMAZON.COM INC 4.20% |
| TREASURY BILL 3.44% | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 4.11% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 3.96% | |
| ALPHABET INC 3.54% | |
| TESLA INC 3.17% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONY | GPIQ | CONY | GPIQ | CONY | GPIQ | |
| 3 months | +21.3% | +2.4% | 17.2% | 2.6% | +0.2 pts | +0.3 pts |
| 6 months | +0.2% | +17.1% | 30.5% | 5.8% | +6.6 pts | −3.1 pts |
| 1 year | −36.5% | +24.2% | 40.7% | 11.3% | +3.3 pts | −1.4 pts |
| 3 years | +43.5% | n/a | 171.0% | n/a | −94.8 pts | n/a |
| Since launch | +43.7% | +97.4% | 171.3% | 38.2% | −89.5 pts | −15.2 pts |
| CONY YieldMax(R) COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | YieldMax | Goldman Sachs |
| Strategy | synthetic covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Coinbase (COIN) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 68.5% | 10.5% |
| Expense ratio | 1.04% | not published |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 40.7% | 11.3% |
| Price change, 1 year | −70.2% | +11.8% |
| Total return, 1 year | −36.5% | +24.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −39.8% | +25.6% |
| Ahead or behind | +3.3 pts | −1.4 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 97% | not published |
| Age | 1116 days | 1044 days |
CONY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, CONY paid 40.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 70.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −36.5%. Coinbase (COIN) returned −39.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.3 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 68.5%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 97% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
GPIQ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 11.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +24.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 10.5%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, CONY or GPIQ?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, CONY paid 40.7% of its starting price in cash and GPIQ paid 11.3%, so CONY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, CONY or GPIQ?
- With every distribution reinvested, CONY returned −36.5% and GPIQ returned +24.2% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so GPIQ returned more.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CONY against GPIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/CONY-GPIQ.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.