Which paid more, APLY or XYLD?

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, APLY paid 30.9% of its starting price in cash and XYLD paid 11.1%, so APLY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, APLY or XYLD?

With every distribution reinvested, APLY returned +18.6% and XYLD returned +18.6% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so APLY returned more.

Which is cheaper, APLY or XYLD?

APLY charges 1.04% a year and XYLD charges 0.60%, so XYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.

APLY vs XYLD

Name: ETFIQ comparison of APLY and XYLD
Creator: ETFIQ

YieldMax(R) AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF, side by side on the income desk.

Open the live comparison on ETFIQ

APLY and XYLD on the income desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	APLY YieldMax(R) AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF	XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
Issuer	YieldMax	Global X
Strategy	synthetic covered call	covered call
Benchmark	Apple (AAPL)	All-country world (ACWI)
Pays	weekly	monthly
Payout rate, annualised	26.2%	9.0%
Expense ratio	1.04%	0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year	30.9%	11.1%
Price change, 1 year	−14.8%	+6.5%
Total return, 1 year	+18.6%	+18.6%
Benchmark return, 1 year	+33.9%	+22.7%
Ahead or behind	−15.3 pts	−4.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate	92%	93%
Age	1235 days	4820 days

APLY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, APLY paid 30.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 14.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.6%. Apple (AAPL) returned +33.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 15.3 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 26.2%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 92% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).

XYLD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, XYLD paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.6%. All-country world (ACWI) returned +22.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.1 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 9.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, APLY or XYLD?: Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, APLY paid 30.9% of its starting price in cash and XYLD paid 11.1%, so APLY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, APLY or XYLD?: With every distribution reinvested, APLY returned +18.6% and XYLD returned +18.6% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so APLY returned more.
Which is cheaper, APLY or XYLD?: APLY charges 1.04% a year and XYLD charges 0.60%, so XYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Cite this page. ETFIQ, APLY against XYLD, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/APLY-XYLD.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; every figure here is stated arithmetic on published data. Standards and sources