Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
APLY vs TSLY
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, APLY and TSLY hold 85% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | APLY | TSLY |
|---|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL | 19.97% | 22.62% |
| TREASURY BILL | 19.80% | 20.60% |
| TREASURY BILL | 19.47% | 22.39% |
| TREASURY BILL | 13.52% | 22.04% |
| TREASURY BILL | 27.23% | 12.35% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APLY | TSLY | APLY | TSLY | APLY | TSLY | |
| 3 months | +0.6% | −8.8% | 8.1% | 11.3% | −3.6 pts | +0.7 pts |
| 6 months | +15.5% | −10.4% | 17.8% | 21.9% | −9.0 pts | +0.3 pts |
| 1 year | +18.6% | +7.7% | 30.9% | 55.9% | −15.3 pts | +3.1 pts |
| 3 years | +39.1% | +19.9% | 65.7% | 86.2% | −31.8 pts | −18.2 pts |
| Since launch | +51.5% | +35.2% | 74.1% | 97.0% | −43.8 pts | −58.0 pts |
| APLY YieldMax(R) AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF | TSLY YieldMax(R) TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | YieldMax | YieldMax |
| Strategy | synthetic covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | Apple (AAPL) | Tesla (TSLA) |
| Pays | weekly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 26.2% | 48.5% |
| Expense ratio | 1.04% | 1.07% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 30.9% | 55.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | −14.8% | −41.6% |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.6% | +7.7% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +33.9% | +4.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −15.3 pts | +3.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 92% | 36% |
| Age | 1235 days | 1381 days |
APLY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, APLY paid 30.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 14.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.6%. Apple (AAPL) returned +33.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 15.3 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 26.2%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 92% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
TSLY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, TSLY paid 55.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 41.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.7%. Tesla (TSLA) returned +4.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.1 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 48.5%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 36% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, APLY or TSLY?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, APLY paid 30.9% of its starting price in cash and TSLY paid 55.9%, so TSLY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, APLY or TSLY?
- With every distribution reinvested, APLY returned +18.6% and TSLY returned +7.7% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so APLY returned more.
- Which is cheaper, APLY or TSLY?
- APLY charges 1.04% a year and TSLY charges 1.07%, so APLY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, APLY against TSLY, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/APLY-TSLY.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.