Which paid more, APLY or FEPI?

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, APLY paid 30.9% of its starting price in cash and FEPI paid 23.2%, so APLY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, APLY or FEPI?

With every distribution reinvested, APLY returned +18.6% and FEPI returned +17.8% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so APLY returned more.

Which is cheaper, APLY or FEPI?

APLY charges 1.04% a year and FEPI charges 0.65%, so FEPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.

APLY vs FEPI

Name: ETFIQ comparison of APLY and FEPI
Creator: ETFIQ

YieldMax(R) AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF and REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF, side by side on the income desk.

Open the live comparison on ETFIQ

APLY and FEPI on the income desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	APLY YieldMax(R) AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF	FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF
Issuer	YieldMax	REX
Strategy	synthetic covered call	covered call
Benchmark	Apple (AAPL)	Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy
Pays	weekly	weekly
Payout rate, annualised	26.2%	25.1%
Expense ratio	1.04%	0.65%
Cash paid, 1 year	30.9%	23.2%
Price change, 1 year	−14.8%	−7.5%
Total return, 1 year	+18.6%	+17.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year	+33.9%	+25.6%
Ahead or behind	−15.3 pts	−7.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate	92%	not published
Age	1235 days	1059 days

APLY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, APLY paid 30.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 14.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.6%. Apple (AAPL) returned +33.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 15.3 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 26.2%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 92% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).

FEPI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, FEPI paid 23.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 7.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.8%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.8 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 25.1%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, APLY or FEPI?: Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, APLY paid 30.9% of its starting price in cash and FEPI paid 23.2%, so APLY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, APLY or FEPI?: With every distribution reinvested, APLY returned +18.6% and FEPI returned +17.8% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so APLY returned more.
Which is cheaper, APLY or FEPI?: APLY charges 1.04% a year and FEPI charges 0.65%, so FEPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Cite this page. ETFIQ, APLY against FEPI, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/APLY-FEPI.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; every figure here is stated arithmetic on published data. Standards and sources