Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
AIPI vs QYLD
REX AI EQUITY PREMIUM INCOME ETF and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF, side by side on the income desk.
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ| AIPI REX AI EQUITY PREMIUM INCOME ETF | QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | REX | Global X |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | AI and technology (AIQ), used as the AI proxy | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 35.0% | 11.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.60% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 31.2% | 12.7% |
| Price change, 1 year | −10.2% | +9.5% |
| Total return, 1 year | +25.5% | +23.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +42.9% | +25.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −17.3 pts | −2.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 100% | 100% |
| Age | 822 days | 4649 days |
AIPI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, AIPI paid 31.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +25.5%. AI and technology (AIQ), used as the AI proxy returned +42.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 17.3 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 35.0%, paid weekly. REX estimates that 100% of the distribution paid was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
QYLD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QYLD paid 12.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +23.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 11.9%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, AIPI or QYLD?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, AIPI paid 31.2% of its starting price in cash and QYLD paid 12.7%, so AIPI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, AIPI or QYLD?
- With every distribution reinvested, AIPI returned +25.5% and QYLD returned +23.5% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so AIPI returned more.
- Which is cheaper, AIPI or QYLD?
- AIPI charges 0.65% a year and QYLD charges 0.60%, so QYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AIPI against QYLD, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/AIPI-QYLD.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; every figure here is stated arithmetic on published data. Standards and sources