Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VOO vs XT

Vanguard 500 Index Fund and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VOO and XT hold 33% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VOO and XT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVOOXT
NVIDIA Corp7.53%4.02%
Microsoft Corp4.31%3.62%
Amazon.com Inc3.63%3.18%
Alphabet Inc3.26%2.84%
Broadcom Inc2.78%2.23%
Tesla Inc1.84%3.52%
Meta Platforms Inc1.92%1.67%
Eli Lilly & Co1.48%3.41%
Johnson & Johnson0.95%2.67%
Micron Technology Inc2.02%0.77%
Cisco Systems Inc0.72%1.16%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc1.47%0.71%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VOOOnly in XT
Apple Inc 6.61%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 2.36%
Alphabet Inc 2.60%Infineon Technologies AG 1.87%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.43%Iberdrola, S.A. 1.53%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.26%ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.50%
Intel Corp 1.03%Roche Holding AG 1.48%
Applied Materials Inc 0.89%Novartis AG 1.40%
Exxon Mobil Corp 0.88%Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 1.32%
Visa Inc 0.87%XIAOMI CORPORATION 1.20%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

VOO and XT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VOO
Vanguard 500 Index Fund
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
Where it sitsCore fundThemes desk
IssuerVanguardiShares
What it isS&P 500Broad innovation and megatrends
Total return, 1 year+20.1%+31.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+20.0%+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.1 pts+11.3 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.46%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%65.9%
Holdings506218

VOO in plain words

VOO is a index equity fund tracking S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.1% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 36.5%.

XT in plain words

By weight, 66% of XT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 67%. The top ten holdings are 35% of the fund across 218 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +31.3% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 11.3 pts.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VOO or XT?
In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VOO returned +20.1% and XT returned +31.3%, so XT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VOO or XT?
VOO charges 0.03% a year and XT charges 0.46%, so VOO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VOO and XT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of VOO and 66% of XT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 33% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are VOO and XT the same kind of fund?
No. VOO is an index ETF and XT is a thematic ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VOO against XT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VOO against XT, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VOO-XT.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources