Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VOO vs XAR

Vanguard 500 Index Fund and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Aerospace & Defense ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, VOO and XAR hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions VOO and XAR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingVOOXAR
General Electric Co0.61%3.02%
RTX Corp0.40%2.75%
Boeing Co/The0.27%2.67%
Howmet Aerospace Inc0.17%2.77%
Lockheed Martin Corp0.16%2.50%
General Dynamics Corp0.14%2.67%
TransDigm Group Inc0.12%2.83%
Northrop Grumman Corp0.11%2.42%
L3Harris Technologies Inc0.08%2.47%
Axon Enterprise Inc0.07%3.23%
Textron Inc0.03%2.59%
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc0.02%2.49%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in VOOOnly in XAR
NVIDIA Corp 7.53%VSE Corp 3.40%
Apple Inc 6.61%StandardAero Inc 3.11%
Microsoft Corp 4.31%FTAI Aviation Ltd 3.09%
Amazon.com Inc 3.63%Carpenter Technology Corp 3.04%
Alphabet Inc 3.26%Woodward Inc 2.98%
Broadcom Inc 2.78%HEICO Corp 2.86%
Alphabet Inc 2.60%Moog Inc 2.86%
Micron Technology Inc 2.02%Hexcel Corp 2.81%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026.

VOO and XAR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VOO
Vanguard 500 Index Fund
XAR
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Aerospace & Defense ETF
Where it sitsCore fundThemes desk
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isS&P 500Defense
Total return, 1 year+20.1%+17.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+20.0%+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.1 pts−2.1 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.35%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%32.4%
Holdings50648

VOO in plain words

VOO is a index equity fund tracking S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.1% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 36.5%.

XAR in plain words

By weight, 32% of XAR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 30% of the fund across 48 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts. It sits 14.8% below its all-time high of Aug 14, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VOO or XAR?
In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VOO returned +20.1% and XAR returned +17.9%, so VOO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, VOO or XAR?
VOO charges 0.03% a year and XAR charges 0.35%, so VOO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VOO and XAR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of VOO and 32% of XAR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are VOO and XAR the same kind of fund?
No. VOO is an index ETF and XAR is a thematic ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VOO against XAR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VOO against XAR, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/VOO-XAR.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources