Which returned more over the last year, UOCT or VOO?

In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, UOCT returned +10.7% and VOO returned +20.1%, so VOO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, UOCT or VOO?

UOCT charges 0.79% a year and VOO charges 0.03%, so VOO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Are UOCT and VOO the same kind of fund?

No. UOCT is a buffer ETF and VOO is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

UOCT vs VOO

Name: ETFIQ comparison of UOCT and VOO
Creator: ETFIQ
License: https://etfiq.com/standards/

Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - Oct and Vanguard 500 Index Fund.

UOCT and VOO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	UOCT Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - Oct	VOO Vanguard 500 Index Fund
Where it sits	Buffer desk	Core fund
Issuer	Innovator	Vanguard
What it is	Defined outcome, on SPY	S&P 500
Total return, 1 year	+10.7%	+20.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+20.0%	+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500	−9.3 pts	+0.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.79%	0.03%
Holdings	n/a	506

UOCT in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +11.0% for the period on Sep 4, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 0.5% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 14.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 17.8% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 30.0% of the 30.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 26 days remained on Sep 4, 2026. On Sep 30, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.

VOO in plain words

VOO is a index equity fund tracking S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.1% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 36.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, UOCT or VOO?: In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, UOCT returned +10.7% and VOO returned +20.1%, so VOO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, UOCT or VOO?: UOCT charges 0.79% a year and VOO charges 0.03%, so VOO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are UOCT and VOO the same kind of fund?: No. UOCT is a buffer ETF and VOO is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

UOCT against VOO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, UOCT against VOO, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/UOCT-VOO.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources