Which returned more over the last year, RYLD or SCHD?

In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RYLD returned +21.0% and SCHD returned +30.3%, so SCHD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, RYLD or SCHD?

RYLD charges 0.60% a year and SCHD charges 0.06%, so SCHD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Are RYLD and SCHD the same kind of fund?

No. RYLD is an option-income ETF and SCHD is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

RYLD vs SCHD

Name: ETFIQ comparison of RYLD and SCHD
Creator: ETFIQ
License: https://etfiq.com/standards/

Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF.

RYLD and SCHD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
Where it sits	Income desk	Core fund
Issuer	Global X	Schwab
What it is	covered call, vs IWM	US dividend
Total return, 1 year	+21.0%	+30.3%
S&P 500 over the same days	+26.4%	+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500	−5.4 pts	+10.3 pts
Cash paid, 1 year	12.4%	not an income fund
Expense ratio	0.60%	0.06%
Holdings	n/a	99

RYLD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, RYLD paid 12.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 7.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.0%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +26.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.4 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 12.2%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).

SCHD in plain words

SCHD is a index equity fund tracking US dividend. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +30.3% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 43.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RYLD or SCHD?: In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RYLD returned +21.0% and SCHD returned +30.3%, so SCHD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, RYLD or SCHD?: RYLD charges 0.60% a year and SCHD charges 0.06%, so SCHD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are RYLD and SCHD the same kind of fund?: No. RYLD is an option-income ETF and SCHD is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RYLD against SCHD, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/RYLD-SCHD.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. ETFIQ publishes the same fields for every fund and suggests no allocation. Standards and sources