Which returned more over the last year, QQQI or VOO?

In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQI returned +18.7% and VOO returned +20.1%, so VOO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, QQQI or VOO?

QQQI charges 0.68% a year and VOO charges 0.03%, so VOO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Are QQQI and VOO the same kind of fund?

No. QQQI is an option-income ETF and VOO is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

QQQI vs VOO

Name: ETFIQ comparison of QQQI and VOO
Creator: ETFIQ
License: https://etfiq.com/standards/

NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF and Vanguard 500 Index Fund.

QQQI and VOO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF	VOO Vanguard 500 Index Fund
Where it sits	Income desk	Core fund
Issuer	NEOS	Vanguard
What it is	covered call, vs QQQ	S&P 500
Total return, 1 year	+18.7%	+20.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+25.6%	+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500	−6.9 pts	+0.1 pts
Cash paid, 1 year	14.4%	not an income fund
Expense ratio	0.68%	0.03%
Holdings	n/a	506

QQQI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QQQI paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.9 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 14.3%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).

VOO in plain words

VOO is a index equity fund tracking S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.1% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 36.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QQQI or VOO?: In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQI returned +18.7% and VOO returned +20.1%, so VOO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QQQI or VOO?: QQQI charges 0.68% a year and VOO charges 0.03%, so VOO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are QQQI and VOO the same kind of fund?: No. QQQI is an option-income ETF and VOO is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQI against VOO, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/QQQI-VOO.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. ETFIQ publishes the same fields for every fund and suggests no allocation. Standards and sources