Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
QQQ vs RYLD
Invesco QQQ Trust and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QQQ and RYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in QQQ | Only in RYLD |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp. 8.16% | Global X Russell 2000 ETF 100.00% |
| Apple Inc. 7.29% | N/A 0.00% |
| Microsoft Corp. 5.32% | N/A 0.00% |
| Micron Technology, Inc. 4.80% | N/A 0.00% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. 4.62% | N/A 0.00% |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 3.70% | N/A 0.00% |
| Alphabet Inc. 3.52% | |
| Tesla, Inc. 3.46% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust | RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Income desk |
| Issuer | Invesco | Global X |
| What it is | Nasdaq-100, book from QQQM | covered call, vs IWM |
| Total return, 1 year | +25.6% | +21.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +20.0% | +26.4% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5.6 pts | −5.4 pts |
| Cash paid, 1 year | not an income fund | 12.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.60% |
| Holdings | 101 | n/a |
QQQ in plain words
QQQ is a index equity fund tracking Nasdaq-100, book from QQQM. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 47.5%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 4, 2026.
RYLD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, RYLD paid 12.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 7.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.0%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +26.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.4 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 12.2%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, QQQ or RYLD?
- In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQ returned +25.6% and RYLD returned +21.0%, so QQQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, QQQ or RYLD?
- QQQ charges 0.18% a year and RYLD charges 0.60%, so QQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- Are QQQ and RYLD the same kind of fund?
- No. QQQ is an index ETF and RYLD is an option-income ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQ against RYLD, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/QQQ-RYLD.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources