Which returned more over the last year, OARK or QQQ?

In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, OARK returned +13.3% and QQQ returned +25.6%, so QQQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, OARK or QQQ?

OARK charges 1.00% a year and QQQ charges 0.18%, so QQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Are OARK and QQQ the same kind of fund?

No. OARK is an option-income ETF and QQQ is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

OARK vs QQQ

Name: ETFIQ comparison of OARK and QQQ
Creator: ETFIQ
License: https://etfiq.com/standards/

YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust.

OARK and QQQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	OARK YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF	QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust
Where it sits	Income desk	Core fund
Issuer	YieldMax	Invesco
What it is	synthetic covered call, vs QQQ	Nasdaq-100, book from QQQM
Total return, 1 year	+13.3%	+25.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+25.6%	+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500	−12.3 pts	+5.6 pts
Cash paid, 1 year	39.3%	not an income fund
Expense ratio	1.00%	0.18%
Holdings	n/a	101

OARK in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, OARK paid 39.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 29.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.3 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 40.3%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 78% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).

QQQ in plain words

QQQ is a index equity fund tracking Nasdaq-100, book from QQQM. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 47.5%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 4, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, OARK or QQQ?: In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, OARK returned +13.3% and QQQ returned +25.6%, so QQQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, OARK or QQQ?: OARK charges 1.00% a year and QQQ charges 0.18%, so QQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are OARK and QQQ the same kind of fund?: No. OARK is an option-income ETF and QQQ is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Cite this page. ETFIQ, OARK against QQQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/OARK-QQQ.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. ETFIQ publishes the same fields for every fund and suggests no allocation. Standards and sources