Which returned more over the last year, KWEB or VTI?

In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, KWEB returned −27.2% and VTI returned +20.0%, so VTI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, KWEB or VTI?

KWEB charges 0.69% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do KWEB and VTI overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 0% of KWEB and 88% of VTI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Are KWEB and VTI the same kind of fund?

No. KWEB is a thematic ETF and VTI is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

KWEB vs VTI

Name: ETFIQ comparison of KWEB and VTI
Creator: ETFIQ
License: https://etfiq.com/standards/

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund.

KWEB and VTI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
Where it sits	Themes desk	Core fund
Issuer	KraneShares	Vanguard
What it is	Internet and e-commerce	US total market
Total return, 1 year	−27.2%	+20.0%
S&P 500 over the same days	+20.0%	+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500	−47.2 pts	+0.0 pts
Expense ratio	0.69%	0.03%
Already in the S&P 500	0.0%	88.3%
Holdings	33	3531

KWEB in plain words

By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 33 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −27.2% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 47.2 pts. It sits 69.8% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.

VTI in plain words

VTI is a index equity fund tracking US total market. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.0% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, KWEB or VTI?: In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, KWEB returned −27.2% and VTI returned +20.0%, so VTI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, KWEB or VTI?: KWEB charges 0.69% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do KWEB and VTI overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 0% of KWEB and 88% of VTI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Are KWEB and VTI the same kind of fund?: No. KWEB is a thematic ETF and VTI is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Cite this page. ETFIQ, KWEB against VTI, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/KWEB-VTI.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. ETFIQ publishes the same fields for every fund and suggests no allocation. Standards and sources