Which returned more over the last year, IWM or VTI?

In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +26.4% and VTI returned +20.0%, so IWM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IWM or VTI?

IWM charges 0.19% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do IWM and VTI overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWM and 88% of VTI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

IWM vs VTI

Name: ETFIQ comparison of IWM and VTI
Creator: ETFIQ
License: https://etfiq.com/standards/

iShares Russell 2000 ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund.

IWM and VTI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	Russell 2000	US total market
Total return, 1 year	+26.4%	+20.0%
S&P 500 over the same days	+20.0%	+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500	+6.5 pts	+0.0 pts
Expense ratio	0.19%	0.03%
Already in the S&P 500	0.0%	88.3%
Holdings	2014	3531

IWM in plain words

IWM is a index equity fund tracking Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +26.4% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2014 positions, with the top ten at 3.4%.

VTI in plain words

VTI is a index equity fund tracking US total market. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.0% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWM or VTI?: In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +26.4% and VTI returned +20.0%, so IWM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWM or VTI?: IWM charges 0.19% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWM and VTI overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWM and 88% of VTI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWM against VTI, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWM-VTI.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. ETFIQ publishes the same fields for every fund and suggests no allocation. Standards and sources