Which returned more over the last year, IWM or RSP?

In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +26.4% and RSP returned +18.3%, so IWM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IWM or RSP?

IWM charges 0.19% a year and RSP charges 0.20%, so IWM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do IWM and RSP overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWM and 99% of RSP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

IWM vs RSP

Name: ETFIQ comparison of IWM and RSP
Creator: ETFIQ
License: https://etfiq.com/standards/

iShares Russell 2000 ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF.

IWM and RSP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	iShares	Invesco
What it is	Russell 2000	S&P 500 equal weight
Total return, 1 year	+26.4%	+18.3%
S&P 500 over the same days	+20.0%	+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500	+6.5 pts	−1.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.19%	0.20%
Already in the S&P 500	0.0%	99.1%
Holdings	2014	503

IWM in plain words

IWM is a index equity fund tracking Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +26.4% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2014 positions, with the top ten at 3.4%.

RSP in plain words

RSP is a index equity fund tracking S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +18.3% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 503 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWM or RSP?: In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +26.4% and RSP returned +18.3%, so IWM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWM or RSP?: IWM charges 0.19% a year and RSP charges 0.20%, so IWM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWM and RSP overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWM and 99% of RSP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWM against RSP, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWM-RSP.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. ETFIQ publishes the same fields for every fund and suggests no allocation. Standards and sources