Get alerts

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ISPY vs SCHD

ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF.

ISPY and SCHD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ISPY
ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
Where it sitsIncome deskCore fund
IssuerProSharesSchwab
What it iscovered call, vs SPYUS dividend
Total return, 1 year+16.9%+30.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+20.0%+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500−3.1 pts+10.3 pts
Cash paid, 1 year5.7%not an income fund
Expense rationot published0.06%
Holdingsn/a99

ISPY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, ISPY paid 5.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 10.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +20.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.1 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 5.8%, paid monthly.

SCHD in plain words

SCHD is a index equity fund tracking US dividend. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +30.3% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 43.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ISPY or SCHD?
In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ISPY returned +16.9% and SCHD returned +30.3%, so SCHD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Are ISPY and SCHD the same kind of fund?
No. ISPY is an option-income ETF and SCHD is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ISPY against SCHD, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ISPY-SCHD.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. ETFIQ publishes the same fields for every fund and suggests no allocation. Standards and sources