Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IJR vs SPY
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.
| IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | SPY SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | S&P SmallCap 600 | S&P 500, book from IVV |
| Total return, 1 year | +24.0% | +20.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +20.0% | +20.0% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +4.0 pts | +0.0 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.06% | not published |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 603 | 504 |
IJR in plain words
IJR is a index equity fund tracking S&P SmallCap 600. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +24.0% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 603 positions, with the top ten at 6.0%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 4, 2026.
SPY in plain words
SPY is a index equity fund tracking S&P 500, book from IVV. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.0% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IJR or SPY?
- In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJR returned +24.0% and SPY returned +20.0%, so IJR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- How much do IJR and SPY overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJR and 100% of SPY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJR against SPY, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJR-SPY.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. ETFIQ publishes the same fields for every fund and suggests no allocation. Standards and sources