Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IGV vs QQQ

iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IGV and QQQ hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IGV and QQQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIGVQQQ
Microsoft Corp.8.08%5.32%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.7.71%1.58%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.10.38%1.01%
AppLovin Corp.4.76%0.83%
Crowdstrike Holdings, Inc.7.29%0.81%
Adobe, Inc.3.13%0.46%
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.3.92%0.46%
Fortinet, Inc.3.62%0.45%
Intuit, Inc.2.73%0.40%
Synopsys, Inc.3.23%0.40%
Datadog, Inc.3.26%0.36%
Electronic Arts, Inc.1.75%0.22%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IGVOnly in QQQ
Oracle Corp. 6.26%NVIDIA Corp. 8.16%
Salesforce, Inc. 4.81%Apple Inc. 7.29%
ServiceNow, Inc. 3.87%Micron Technology, Inc. 4.80%
Fair Isaac Corp. 1.05%Amazon.com, Inc. 4.62%
Zoom Communications, Inc. 0.87%Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 3.70%
Gen Digital, Inc. 0.52%Alphabet Inc. 3.52%
Nutanix, Inc. 0.51%Tesla, Inc. 3.46%
PTC, Inc. 0.50%Broadcom Inc. 3.37%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IGV and QQQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust
Where it sitsThemes deskCore fund
IssueriSharesInvesco
What it isCloud and softwareNasdaq-100, book from QQQM
Total return, 1 year−2.1%+25.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+20.0%+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500−22.1 pts+5.6 pts
Expense rationot published0.18%
Already in the S&P 50083.2%96.7%
Holdings107101

IGV in plain words

By weight, 83% of IGV's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 107 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned −2.1% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 22.1 pts. It sits 11.2% below its all-time high of Sep 22, 2025.

QQQ in plain words

QQQ is a index equity fund tracking Nasdaq-100, book from QQQM. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 47.5%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 4, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IGV or QQQ?
In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGV returned −2.1% and QQQ returned +25.6%, so QQQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
How much do IGV and QQQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 83% of IGV and 97% of QQQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are IGV and QQQ the same kind of fund?
No. IGV is a thematic ETF and QQQ is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IGV against QQQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IGV against QQQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IGV-QQQ.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources