Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FTXL vs QQQ
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTXL and QQQ hold 31% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FTXL | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corporation | 7.05% | 8.16% |
| Micron Technology, Inc. | 13.38% | 4.80% |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 6.47% | 3.70% |
| Broadcom Inc. | 6.08% | 3.37% |
| Intel Corporation | 11.40% | 2.52% |
| Lam Research Corporation | 3.57% | 1.75% |
| Applied Materials, Inc. | 3.31% | 1.57% |
| Texas Instruments Incorporated | 3.30% | 1.22% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporated | 6.43% | 1.18% |
| KLA Corporation | 3.30% | 1.11% |
| Analog Devices, Inc. | 2.76% | 0.89% |
| Marvell Technology, Inc. | 7.42% | 0.78% |
| Only in FTXL | Only in QQQ |
|---|---|
| ON Semiconductor Corporation 3.03% | Apple Inc. 7.29% |
| Skyworks Solutions, Inc. 3.02% | Microsoft Corp. 5.32% |
| Amkor Technology, Inc. 2.32% | Amazon.com, Inc. 4.62% |
| Teradyne, Inc. 1.51% | Alphabet Inc. 3.52% |
| Entegris, Inc. 1.44% | Tesla, Inc. 3.46% |
| Astera Labs, Inc. 1.08% | Alphabet Inc. 3.26% |
| Avnet, Inc. 1.04% | Meta Platforms, Inc. 2.97% |
| Cirrus Logic, Inc. 0.98% | Walmart Inc. 2.48% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for May 31, 2026 and Sep 4, 2026.
| FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Themes desk | Core fund |
| Issuer | First Trust | Invesco |
| What it is | Semiconductors | Nasdaq-100, book from QQQM |
| Total return, 1 year | +131.1% | +25.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +20.0% | +20.0% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +111.2 pts | +5.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 85.6% | 96.7% |
| Holdings | 35 | 101 |
FTXL in plain words
By weight, 86% of FTXL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 81%. The top ten holdings are 68% of the fund across 35 positions, as filed for Sep 3, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +131.1% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 111.2 pts. It sits 23.3% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.
QQQ in plain words
QQQ is a index equity fund tracking Nasdaq-100, book from QQQM. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 47.5%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 4, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTXL or QQQ?
- In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTXL returned +131.1% and QQQ returned +25.6%, so FTXL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FTXL or QQQ?
- FTXL charges 0.60% a year and QQQ charges 0.18%, so QQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FTXL and QQQ overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 86% of FTXL and 97% of QQQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 31% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
- Are FTXL and QQQ the same kind of fund?
- No. FTXL is a thematic ETF and QQQ is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTXL against QQQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FTXL-QQQ.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources