Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FDN vs QQQ
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund and Invesco QQQ Trust.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDN and QQQ hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FDN | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon.com, Inc. | 9.84% | 4.62% |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class A) | 4.78% | 3.52% |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class C) | 3.82% | 3.26% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) | 9.79% | 2.97% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. | 7.22% | 2.09% |
| Netflix, Inc. | 3.89% | 1.59% |
| Booking Holdings Inc. | 4.91% | 0.58% |
| Datadog, Inc. (Class A) | 2.63% | 0.36% |
| DoorDash, Inc. (Class A) | 3.00% | 0.29% |
| Airbnb, Inc. (Class A) | 2.84% | 0.25% |
| PayPal Holdings, Inc. | 1.81% | 0.18% |
| Copart, Inc. | 1.12% | 0.14% |
| Only in FDN | Only in QQQ |
|---|---|
| Salesforce, Inc. 6.19% | NVIDIA Corp. 8.16% |
| Arista Networks, Inc. 5.21% | Apple Inc. 7.29% |
| Oracle Corporation 4.52% | Microsoft Corp. 5.32% |
| Snowflake Inc. (Class A) 4.35% | Micron Technology, Inc. 4.80% |
| Cloudflare, Inc. (Class A) 3.33% | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 3.70% |
| Carvana Co. (Class A) 1.99% | Tesla, Inc. 3.46% |
| eBay Inc. 1.71% | Broadcom Inc. 3.37% |
| Ciena Corporation 1.70% | Intel Corp. 2.52% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for May 31, 2026 and Sep 4, 2026.
| FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund | QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Themes desk | Core fund |
| Issuer | First Trust | Invesco |
| What it is | Internet and e-commerce | Nasdaq-100, book from QQQM |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.8% | +25.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +20.0% | +20.0% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −16.2 pts | +5.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 82.7% | 96.7% |
| Holdings | 42 | 101 |
FDN in plain words
By weight, 83% of FDN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 42 positions, as filed for Sep 3, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 16.2 pts.
QQQ in plain words
QQQ is a index equity fund tracking Nasdaq-100, book from QQQM. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 47.5%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 4, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FDN or QQQ?
- In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDN returned +3.8% and QQQ returned +25.6%, so QQQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FDN or QQQ?
- FDN charges 0.49% a year and QQQ charges 0.18%, so QQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FDN and QQQ overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 83% of FDN and 97% of QQQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 20% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
- Are FDN and QQQ the same kind of fund?
- No. FDN is a thematic ETF and QQQ is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDN against QQQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FDN-QQQ.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources