Get alerts

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

DIVO vs SPY

Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.

DIVO and SPY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
SPY
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Where it sitsIncome deskCore fund
IssuerAmplifyState Street
What it isdividend stocks with call overlay, vs SPYS&P 500, book from IVV
Total return, 1 year+17.9%+20.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+20.0%+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.0 pts+0.0 pts
Cash paid, 1 year6.9%not an income fund
Expense ratio0.56%not published
Holdingsn/a504

DIVO in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, DIVO paid 6.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 10.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +20.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.0 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 4.8%, paid monthly.

SPY in plain words

SPY is a index equity fund tracking S&P 500, book from IVV. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.0% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DIVO or SPY?
In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DIVO returned +17.9% and SPY returned +20.0%, so SPY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Are DIVO and SPY the same kind of fund?
No. DIVO is an option-income ETF and SPY is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DIVO against SPY, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DIVO-SPY.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. ETFIQ publishes the same fields for every fund and suggests no allocation. Standards and sources