Get alerts

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

DAPR vs SPY

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.

DAPR and SPY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DAPR
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April
SPY
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Where it sitsBuffer deskCore fund
IssuerFirst TrustState Street
What it isDefined outcome, on SPYS&P 500, book from IVV
Total return, 1 yearnot published+20.0%
S&P 500 over the same daysnot published+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500not available+0.0 pts
Expense ratio0.85%not published
Holdingsn/a504

DAPR in plain words

From its price on Sep 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 6.4% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 9.9% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 12.4% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 25.0% of the 25.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 224 days remained on Sep 4, 2026. On Apr 16, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

SPY in plain words

SPY is a index equity fund tracking S&P 500, book from IVV. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.0% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.

Questions people ask

Are DAPR and SPY the same kind of fund?
No. DAPR is a buffer ETF and SPY is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DAPR against SPY, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DAPR-SPY.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. ETFIQ publishes the same fields for every fund and suggests no allocation. Standards and sources