Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BAPR vs VOO
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - Apr and Vanguard 500 Index Fund.
| BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - Apr | VOO Vanguard 500 Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Buffer desk | Core fund |
| Issuer | Innovator | Vanguard |
| What it is | Defined outcome, on SPY | S&P 500 |
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +20.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | not published | +20.0% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | not available | +0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% |
| Holdings | n/a | 506 |
BAPR in plain words
From its price on Sep 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 6.0% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 10.6% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 15.6% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 9.0% of the 9.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 208 days remained on Sep 4, 2026. On Mar 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
VOO in plain words
VOO is a index equity fund tracking S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.1% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 36.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, BAPR or VOO?
- BAPR charges 0.79% a year and VOO charges 0.03%, so VOO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- Are BAPR and VOO the same kind of fund?
- No. BAPR is a buffer ETF and VOO is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BAPR against VOO, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BAPR-VOO.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. ETFIQ publishes the same fields for every fund and suggests no allocation. Standards and sources